Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Transl Pediatr ; 12(5): 890-896, 2023 May 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2310930

RESUMEN

Background: During 4 months of the severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, nurses in a pediatric emergency department (ED) used surgical and clear face masks in triage. This study aimed to find out if the type of face mask influenced children's reports of pain. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of the pain scores of all patients aged 3-15 years who visited the ED during the 4-month period was performed. Multivariate regression was used to control for the potential confounders of demographics, diagnosis (medical, trauma), nurse experience, ED time of arrival, and triage acuity level. Self-reports of pain ≥1/10 and pain ≥4/10 were the dependent variables. Results: Overall, 3,069 children attended the ED during the study period. Triage nurses wore surgical and clear face masks in 2,337 and 732 nurse-patient encounters, respectively. The two types of face masks were used in similar proportions of nurse-patient encounters. Compared with the clear face mask, wearing a surgical face mask was associated with a lower likelihood of reporting pain ≥1/10, and a lower likelihood of reporting pain ≥4/10; [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) =0.68; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.56-0.82], and (aOR =0.71; 95% CI: 0.58-0.86), respectively. Conclusions: The findings suggest that the type of face mask used by the nurse influenced the report of pain. This study provides preliminary evidence that covered face masks worn by healthcare providers might have a negative impact on the child's report of pain.

2.
J Pediatr ; 2022 Oct 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2256223

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical effectiveness of the BNT162b2 vaccine during pregnancy in preventing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) hospitalizations of infants. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective, multicenter, 1:3 case-control (test-negative) study. Symptomatic hospitalized infants less than 6 months of age, with a positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction test between January 3, 2021, and March 11, 2021, were matched by age and time to negative controls, hospitalized with symptoms compatible with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Mothers were defined as fully vaccinated who received 2 doses of BNT162b2 with the second given 2 weeks to 6 months before delivery; or partially vaccinated, if they received only 1 dose or 2 doses with the second given more than 6 months or less than 2 weeks before delivery. Severe SARS-CoV-2 was defined as a need for assisted ventilation. RESULTS: We matched 116 SARS-CoV-2 positive infants with 348 negative controls with symptoms compatible with SARS-CoV-2 infection. The effectiveness of fully vaccinated mothers was 61.6% (95% CI, 31.9-78.4) and the effectiveness of partially vaccinated mothers was not significant. Effectiveness was higher in infants 0-2 vs 3-6 months of age. The effectiveness (57.1%; 95% CI, 22.8-76.4) was similar when excluding mothers who were infected with SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy. The OR of severe infection in infants born to unvaccinated vs fully vaccinated mothers was 5.8. CONCLUSIONS: At least 2 doses of BNT162b2 vaccine administered during the second or third trimester of pregnancy had an effectiveness of 61.6% in decreasing hospitalization for SARS-CoV-2 infection in infants less than 6 months of age.

4.
Ann Intern Med ; 2022 Nov 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2203118

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It is uncertain if medical masks offer similar protection against COVID-19 compared with N95 respirators. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether medical masks are noninferior to N95 respirators to prevent COVID-19 in health care workers providing routine care. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04296643). SETTING: 29 health care facilities in Canada, Israel, Pakistan, and Egypt from 4 May 2020 to 29 March 2022. PARTICIPANTS: 1009 health care workers who provided direct care to patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19. INTERVENTION: Use of medical masks versus fit-tested N95 respirators for 10 weeks, plus universal masking, which was the policy implemented at each site. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was confirmed COVID-19 on reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis, RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 occurred in 52 of 497 (10.46%) participants in the medical mask group versus 47 of 507 (9.27%) in the N95 respirator group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.14 [95% CI, 0.77 to 1.69]). An unplanned subgroup analysis by country found that in the medical mask group versus the N95 respirator group RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 occurred in 8 of 131 (6.11%) versus 3 of 135 (2.22%) in Canada (HR, 2.83 [CI, 0.75 to 10.72]), 6 of 17 (35.29%) versus 4 of 17 (23.53%) in Israel (HR, 1.54 [CI, 0.43 to 5.49]), 3 of 92 (3.26%) versus 2 of 94 (2.13%) in Pakistan (HR, 1.50 [CI, 0.25 to 8.98]), and 35 of 257 (13.62%) versus 38 of 261 (14.56%) in Egypt (HR, 0.95 [CI, 0.60 to 1.50]). There were 47 (10.8%) adverse events related to the intervention reported in the medical mask group and 59 (13.6%) in the N95 respirator group. LIMITATION: Potential acquisition of SARS-CoV-2 through household and community exposure, heterogeneity between countries, uncertainty in the estimates of effect, differences in self-reported adherence, differences in baseline antibodies, and between-country differences in circulating variants and vaccination. CONCLUSION: Among health care workers who provided routine care to patients with COVID-19, the overall estimates rule out a doubling in hazard of RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 for medical masks when compared with HRs of RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 for N95 respirators. The subgroup results varied by country, and the overall estimates may not be applicable to individual countries because of treatment effect heterogeneity. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Canadian Institutes of Health Research, World Health Organization, and Juravinski Research Institute.

5.
Acta Paediatr ; 110(10): 2790-2795, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1273073

RESUMEN

AIM: Minimal data exist regarding the severity of COVID-19 in febrile infants under 60 days old. This multicentre prospective study explored the clinical course and outcomes of this hospitalised patient population, as, to date, the best approach has not been specifically addressed. METHODS: This study focused on the clinical features, laboratory parameters and outcomes of febrile infants up to 60 days old who tested positive for the virus and were hospitalised in Israel from March 2020 to January 2021. The data were extracted from a real-time prospective surveillance network for COVID-19 that includes 20 of the country's 26 hospitals. RESULTS: We identified 75 febrile young infants (60% female) with COVID-19 at a median age of 28 days (range 8-56 days). Of these, 84% had an unremarkable medical history, 29% had respiratory symptoms, and 96% had a mild illness. The Rochester criteria showed that 44% were considered at high-risk for serious bacterial infections, and we found that eight infants actually had concomitant bacterial infections. Outcomes were excellent, and no complications or fatalities were reported. CONCLUSION: The excellent outcomes of young febrile infants with COVID-19 closely resembled other respiratory viral aetiologies of fever in this age group, and there were no fatalities.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas , COVID-19 , Femenino , Fiebre/epidemiología , Fiebre/etiología , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
6.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc ; 10(7): 757-765, 2021 Aug 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1269586

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Most pediatric coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is mild. We assessed nationally severe COVID-19, including pediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome (PIMS), in hospitalized children. METHODS: An ongoing, prospective, national surveillance was conducted from March 2020 through March 2021, at 20 hospitals treating children <18 years across Israel (~75% of Israeli hospitals). RESULTS: Overall, 1007 cases (439 outpatients and 568 hospitalized) identified represent 0.35% of pediatric COVID-19 nationwide (n = 291 628). Of hospitalized cases, 464 (82%), 48 (8%), and 56 (10%) had mild, moderate/severe, and PIMS disease, respectively. The mean ± SD age was 5.6 ± 6.4 years. In mild, moderate/severe, and PIMS disease, 55%, 23%, and 4% of patients were <1 year old, respectively. Obesity was reported in 1%, 4%, and 13% of patients, respectively (P < .001). The most common symptom was fever in 67%, 60%, and 100%, respectively, whereas respiratory symptoms were documented in 33%, 41%, and 38% of patients, respectively. Lymphopenia was recorded in 25%, 60%, and 86% of cases, respectively. PIMS diagnosis was mainly serology-based (in 59%). Gastrointestinal symptoms, cardiovascular involvement, rash, and conjunctivitis were noted in 82%, 61%, 57%, and 34% of PIMS episodes, respectively. Elevated C-reactive protein (100%), ferritin, troponin, D-dimer, low albumin, and thrombocytopenia were common in PIMS. Echocardiography revealed pathological findings in 33% of patients. PIMS mainstay treatment included corticosteroids (77%) and intravenous immunoglobulin (53%). No mortality was recorded. CONCLUSIONS: At a national level, pediatric COVID-19 is mild, even in hospitalized cases, with only a third presenting with respiratory involvement. PIMS is rare, but necessitates a high index of suspicion, and with suitable treatment prognosis is favorable.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Niño , Niño Hospitalizado , Preescolar , Humanos , Lactante , Israel/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica
8.
Epidemiol Infect ; 149: e67, 2021 03 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1137722

RESUMEN

The possibility of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission by fomites or environmental surfaces has been suggested. It is unclear if SARS-CoV-2 can be detected in outdoor public areas. The objective of the current study was to assess the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in environmental samples collected at public playgrounds and water fountains, in a country with high disease prevalence. Environmental samples were collected from six cities in central Israel. Samples were collected from drinking fountains and high-touch recreational equipment at playgrounds. Sterile pre-moistened swabs were used to collect the samples, put in viral transfer media and transferred to the laboratory. Viral detection was achieved by real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, targeting four genes. Forty-three samples were collected from playground equipment and 25 samples from water fountains. Two of the 43 (4.6%) samples from playground equipment and one (4%) sample from a drinking fountain tested positive. It is unclear whether the recovery of viral RNA on outdoor surfaces also indicates the possibility of acquiring the virus. Adherence to environmental and personal hygiene in urban settings seems prudent.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/transmisión , Contaminación de Equipos/estadística & datos numéricos , Parques Recreativos , Juego e Implementos de Juego , ARN Viral/análisis , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Prueba de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19 , Agua Potable , Humanos , Israel , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA